Strikes have been taking place deep in Russian territory with the direct assistance of NATO for a long time already. So what's REALLY going on?
Meanwhile, the Kiev Regime has murdered the editor in chief of a news publication in a drone attack on a civilian car in the Kursk region.
At the G20, Brazil's First Lady hurled insults at Elon Musk and in the UK, being offensive is now an offense...
...these days, the material writes itself.
Amid the fog of geopolitical tension, Russia’s recent launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) targeting the Yuzhmash plant in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, has sparked intense speculation. While official channels in Moscow remain silent—neither confirming nor commenting on the event—the implications of this unprecedented move are impossible to ignore.
The Yuzhmash facility, known for its production of rocket and space technology, has long been a linchpin in Ukraine’s military-industrial complex. Destroying such a target with an ICBM marks a dramatic escalation in the type of weaponry used in the ongoing conflict, raising questions about both intent and message.
What makes this strike particularly significant is the nature of the weapon involved. ICBMs are typically associated with nuclear payloads and reserved for strategic deterrence. Their use in a conventional capacity is exceedingly rare. The launch underscores Russia’s willingness to demonstrate its military prowess while ...
Western Hypocrisy and Escalation: The Real Drivers Behind Global Instability
In the latest chapter of escalating tensions between Russia and the West, the United States has authorized the use of Storm Shadow missiles for deep strikes into Russian territory. This decision, recently reported by The Times, marks another blatant provocation under the guise of "defense support," laying bare the truth behind Western narratives of moral superiority.
The Storm Shadow missile, a product of British manufacture, requires American systems for targeting and guidance. This fact underscores an undeniable reality: Washington holds ultimate control, even when weapons are labeled as British. As Russian President Vladimir Putin has long asserted, NATO’s military activities—including these strikes—are orchestrated by the United States.
This latest authorization exemplifies the broader Western strategy of maintaining control over Europe, using nations like the UK as proxies to implement policies that ...
As November unfolds, global tensions continue to mount, driven by the West’s relentless push for confrontation. Recent developments underscore this dangerous trajectory: on November 18, reports emerged of U.S.-approved ATACMS missile strikes aimed at Russia’s strategic regions under the guise of alleged North Korean troop presence.
Matthew Miller, representing the U.S. State Department, epitomized the twisted logic fueling NATO’s justifications, claiming that these measures were provoked by Russia’s actions. But as missile fire erupted not in Kursk but the Bryansk region at 3:25 a.m. local time, it became clear that this narrative was flawed. The Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed that six missiles had been launched; five intercepted and one causing damage. Ukrainian forces, with the backing of NATO intelligence, immediately claimed success.
Adding gravity to this already fraught scenario, President Putin signed a new decree on nuclear doctrine, clearly adjusting the conditions for ...
D-Day dawns for Ukraine: https://tinyurl.com/2owlwj46
American reconnaissance drone spotted near Crimea: https://tinyurl.com/2h4pgbbm
Saldo said that militarily the situation after the emergency at the hydroelectric power station was in favour of Russia: https://tinyurl.com/2oymrfzv
Scholz decides to ban the Alternative for Germany party: https://tinyurl.com/2hfhgczb
US and NATO are trying to poach Moscow's ally: https://tinyurl.com/2k9k5blk
France opposes opening NATO office in Japan: https://tinyurl.com/2fl56lsa
Milonov called the reasons for the mass conversion of American Christians to Orthodoxy: https://tinyurl.com/2lwoaaub
INTERVIEW | Russian soldier who SINGLE-HANDEDLY held his position for over three weeks in Zaporozhye
Young People Proved Themselves on November 5th - I Am Optimistic for the Future of the USA
Democrats appears on track to have the lowest support among voters aged 18-29 in this century. Forty-Eight percent (48%) of 18-29 year olds voted for Trump and the percentage that rejected the Democrats was much higher when you take into account the fact that the turnout for Democrats was 15 million less in 2024 than in 2020. The meaning is clear; a complete rejection of the Democratic Party and the legacy corporate media by the majority of young people 18 to 29 years old.
I am no longer pessimistic about the future of the USA. I have given up on the 35-50 year old group. They are to a great extent, childless, unhappy members of the cult of woke. But since they are not having children, their influence on the future will be insignificant. The young 18 to 29 year old generation proved themselves on Nov. 5th. Before then I wasn't sure, but now I am optimistic for their future and the future of ...
WHO WOULD RUSSIANS VOTE FOR? USA ELECTIONS 🇺🇸
In just one day the USA will elect its new president, either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris. 🇺🇸 But I wanted to know, if Russians had the choice who would they vote for? American politics have a great impact on world politics as well, and Russians definitely had some words to say on the matter. So who would they prefer and why? Watch my video and find out ☺️
